Every human being, of whatever origin, of whatever station, deserves respect. We must each respect others even as we respect ourselves.

As a Buddhist, I was trained to be tolerant of everything except intolerance. I was brought up not only to develop the spirit of tolerance but also to cherish moral and spiritual qualities such as modesty, humility, compassion, and, most important, to attain a certain degree of emotional equilibrium.

Wars begin in the minds of men, and in those minds, love andcompassion would have built the defenses of peace.

Understanding, love and tolerance are the highest forms of interest on out small and interdependent planet.

The world will not Change and find peace if there is not a new education.

In modern war there is no such thing as victor and vanquished... There is only a loser, and the loser is mankind.

World federalists hold before us the vision of a unified mankind living in peace under a just world order... The heart of their program-a world under law- is realistic and attainable.

The war we have to wage today has only one goal, and that is to make the world safe for diversity.

Respect for the truth comes close to being the basis for all morality.

To understand my feelings — and my conception of the role of Secretary General — the nature of my religious and cultural background must first be understood. I should therefore like to outline not only my beliefs but also my conception of human institutions and of the human situation itself.

I am afraid if the present trend in Vietnam continues that direct confrontation, first of all between Washington and Peking, is inevitable.

The single most important impediment to global institutions is the concept of my country, right or wrong.

As a Buddhist, I was trained to be tolerant of everything except intolerance

Governments, systems, ideologies come and go, but it is humanity which remains.

I don't like to be disturbed at home I tell the cable office not to call me before 6:30 AM, unless there's a war.

The concept of peaceful coexistence has been criticized by many who do not see the need to make the world safe for diversity. I wonder if they have ever paused to ask themselves the question: What is the alternative to coexistence?