That new technologies and techniques would be forthcoming was a fundamental article of Christian faith. Hence, no bishops or theologians denounced clocks or sailing ships-although both were condemned on religious grounds in various non-Western societies.

Evolution has primarily been an attack on religion by militant atheists who wrap themselves in the mantle of science in an effort to refute all religious claims concerning a creator - an effort that has also often attempted to suppress all scientific criticisms of Darwin's work.

For one, thing, the media are dominated by the irreligious. So are universities.

Many people who say they have no religion are simply saying they have no official religious affiliation. They may actually have strong personal beliefs.

Theology is in disrepute among most Western intellectuals. The word is taken to mean a passe form of religious thinking that embraces irrationality and dogmatism. So too, Scholasticism.

[Some men are shortsighted, so] going to prison or going to hell just doesn't matter to these men.

No other single innovation had so much impact on history.

It can be demonstrated that in any society there is a distribution of religious tastes and concerns.

Marines I see as two breeds, Rottweilers or Dobermans, because Marines come in two varieties, big and mean, or skinny and mean. They're aggressive on the attack and tenacious on defense. They've got really short hair and they always go for the throat.

Because God is perfect, his handiwork functions in accord with immutable principles. By the full use of our God-given powers of reason and observation, it ought to be possible to discover these principles. These were the crucial ideas that explain why science arose in Christian Europe and no where else.

Not only were science and religion compatible, they were inseparable--th e rise of science was achieved by deeply religious Christian scholars.

It has been said of many modern Christian theologians that their primary aim is to find ways to express disbelief as belief.

People value religion on the basis of cost, and they don't value the cheapest ones the most. Religions that ask nothing get nothing.

It seems that not being religious is a form of risk-taking, consistent with other patterns of short-sighted behaviour in men.