If the movie is terrible, then the 3D sucks. If the movie is fantastic, then the 3D is good.

Martin Scorsese is doing a 3D movie (Hugo Cabret). A lot of amazing filmmakers are. Not just the obvious of Jim Cameron, but Spielberg is doing it and Peter Jackson has worked in it. In the hands of those types of people, it will just keep getting better and better.

If you do your job right, no one realizes you did your job, and that's a good thing. You strive for that.

Being a parent and having two young kids, I buy Blu-rays and DVDs all the time. It's like buying a toy.

I now know all shades of the color green, having spent 90 days staring at that green screen. I'll never forget that color, as long as I live.

My favorite thing in the whole is getting to work with the actors.

My theory of what makes people likeable stars is that they're likeable.

I don't think every movie should be in 3D. I hope the Coen brothers don't do their next movie in 3D. I don't think they have any plans to.

The best visual effects are when you shoot as much of what you can in camera. And it's really good for the actor's performance to have something real.

I have two little kids and I enjoy watching movies with them, and I can't watch every movie with them. Sometimes it's because it's obviously not appropriate to watch The Bourne Identity with your kids, but a lot of times it's because it's torture to watch the movies that they want to watch, as a parent.