I am always surprised by how much little emphasis schools of architecture, and indeed, many architects, place on the process of the mating of a building.

You cannot separate the buildings out from the infrastructure of cites and the mobility of transit.

Google has already tested robot cars in San Francisco. If they can navigate San Francisco, they can probably manage just about anywhere.

I was born in 1935, and as far back as I can remember, I was sketching designs. My first subject was an aircraft, which I imagined myself piloting.

I'm not a creature of habit. I like to find things from unexpected sources.

Architecture is an expression of values.

I tend to move between turtlenecks and shirts and ties. I don't really have a uniform in the sense that some people might.

I would never wear anything with a logo. That I really find difficult. It's a frustration that I'll find a nice shirt or something and it's got 50 prints of the logo on it - why do they do this?

I think you never stop learning.

Since Stonehenge, architects have always been at the cutting edge of technology. And you cant separate technology from the humanistic and spiritual content of a building.

I hope that any expansion of London will learn from the planning examples of some of its most desirable areas such as Chelsea, Notting Hill, Belgravia and Mayfair. All are characterised by high density and a generosity of green spaces. They are all pedestrian-friendly with shops, entertainment, restaurants and pubs within easy walking distance.

Every time I've flown an aircraft, or visited a steelworks, or watched a panel-beater at work, I've learned something new that can be applied to buildings.

Manhattan, one of the most moneyed spots on the planet, also has one of the greatest concentrations of people in its skyscrapers. Its also, of course, the place where every architect wants to build his tower.

Everything inspires me sometimes I think I see things others don’t.

Our object in life should be to accumulate a great number of grand questions to be asked and resolved in eternity.

The pencil and computer are, if left to their own devices, equally dumb and only as good as the person driving them.

Didn't think her vision was consistent with the ORC, especially the way the Council wishes to work with the ORC. For example, with regard to the zoning ordinance, the Council sees a comprehensive approach, the ORC wants to review the ordinances and simplify them. Pam's vision was counter to that.