I'm very against interviewers who do not have time to read the work, who accept jobs knowing that they don't have time to do the preparation.

I'm often a crier and many things make me cry. I come from a crying family - my mother cries, my grandma used to cry. It was never shameful to cry. My father never told me men don't cry.

I thought I was going to be a math major. My parents were both accountants and wanted me to major in business. Math was our compromise.

I like to think that at best the interview becomes something like the unaccountable experience of talking to oneself in a mirror.

She taught you how to be a person who refuses anything but the meaningful.

People tell me I have the best job in the world, which is true, but I also work with some of the best people in the world.

In the course of interviewing, I've discovered that if you don't give your guest something to react to, they don't react. They simply say what they've been saying every time they've been interviewed. The last thing you want is to have people say to you what they've said to someone else.

The art (as opposed to the technology) of reading requires that you develop a beautiful tolerance for incomprehension. The greatest books are the books that you come to understand more deeply with time, with age and with rereading.