The game of science can accurately be described as a never-ending insult to human intelligence.

...it's the process of losing oneself in the jungle that makes science worth doing.

Although the term dialogue was really a euphemism for scientists trying to kill each other, this format worked very well.

It is sometimes said that we should never believe a scientific theory until it is verified by experiment. But a famous astronomer has also stated that we should never believe an observation until it is confirmed by a theory.

For instance, the blood of hibernating arctic squirrels may supercool to minus 3 degrees, when it would normally congeal. The supercooled blood still flows, since it remains a liquid, but the slightest disturbance will cause it to freeze, killing the squirrel therefore, you should not disturb hibernating arctic squirrels.

I've always felt that copious use of the word 'something' allows anyone to solve any problem, even insoluble ones.